A painful shoulder can be extremely debilitating. When this happens, there is usually limited movement in this part of the body. When the traditional method of treatment fails, shoulder replacement is usually the best option. While approximately 9 out of 10 shoulder replacement procedures are usually last for a decade, there are instances when they do fail. According to the website of Williams Kherkher, a failed shoulder replacement surgery can cause significant injuries to the patient.

Over the years, there has been an increase in the number of shoulder replacement lawsuits. Rather than make the patient feel better, some replacement devices have made life more difficult for patients. They reported various complications such as significant bone loss, instability, weakness, and unexplained pain. Every surgery comes with a risk of failure regardless of what the operation was intended for.

In shoulder replacement, the top of the humerus and shoulder blade is replaced by an artificial implant. Cement is used to make the new components stick. Another alternative for holding the new components together is a material that promotes the growth of the new bone. Rehabilitation generally takes several months. A successful operation is good for 10 to 20 years.

However, the failure of the shoulder replacement may bring about various risks and complications. It can cause infections which may result to the removal of shoulder prosthesis. When the infection is gone, the patient may already receive new implants. A failed shoulder replacement may also cause rotator cuff damage. In addition, it may also cause bone fracture which may result to a second shoulder surgery. When all of these happen, it will usually cause severe pain and disability. The only way to treat shoulder replacement failure is shoulder replacement revision surgery. These types of procedures are usually associated with a higher risk of complication. The patient will usually not be able to return to the same level of functioning after a revision procedure.


read more

Thanks to the exponential advancements in technology, the pharmaceutical industry has been able to evolve in unimaginable ways for the last few decades. Today, medical professionals have access to a huge number of different devices, tools, and medications that makes addressing various health concerns a much easier task. Reliable and accessible medical solutions would be impossible without the pharmaceutical companies that continue to push the borders of innovation.

While the pharmaceutical industry has certainly created many new technologies that allow doctors to do more and more for their patients, its individual players can’t be considered completely infallible. There are plenty of defective medical devices and pharmaceuticals that are that are still widely-used in hospitals and other medical settings across the United States. As a matter of fact, the lawyers of Williams Kherkher have pointed out that a huge percentage of all product liability suits filed in America are for damages caused by medical drugs and devices.

Usually, the Food and Drug Administration is able to catch the issues that could lead to a certain medical product becoming harmful before approving it for public use. There are times, however, when the FDA’s investigations miss certain details and things fall through the cracks. When a medical product ends up being causing harm to patient’s well-being, pharmaceutical companies are expected to take immediate action by calling for a recall and working to improve the errors in their product. Unfortunately, in plenty of occasions, pharmaceutical companies don’t take action until it’s too late.

Metal-on-metal joint implants are an example of defective pharmaceuticals that have caused great harm and injury to a significant number of patients. Complications with these implants are known to cause bone and tissue damage, as well as metal toxicity in the body.


read more

Massachusetts Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack and Massachusetts Housing and Economic Development Secretary Jay Ash, along with other state officials, conducted on Wednesday, April 27 a meeting that seeks to determine how the state can play a role in the self-driving car industry, by making recommendations to the industry that they should hire people who will operate such cars from the state, and by developing regulations that would make it safe for people who want to explore the options of being inside a vehicle without actually manning it.

Self-driving car industry leaders say that such vehicles can potentially make it safer for motorists to drive on roads and highways in the sense that they can lessen traffic congestion. Another great thing about them, industry experts said, is the advantage of allowing people who do not know how to drive to be able to get around.

The elderly, in particular, can be helped by these self-driving vehicles; instead of risking an accident every time they enter the roads with their cars because old age has eroded their once sharp senses and made their reflexes slower than usual, they can rest assured that they will reach their destination safely because an automated pilot is doing the driving for them.

Industry experts also boasted of lower emissions in these vehicles.

John Leonard, a professor at the Massachusetts’ Institute of Technology’s computer science and artificial intelligence laboratory, said there is a possibility that the development of self-driving cars will be likened to the United States-Russia space race back in the 60s, with auto manufacturers like Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford Motor Co. and Detroit, Michigan-based General Motors Co. and technology firms like Uber and Mountain View, California-based Google competing for the industry’s advancements.

In Leonard’s opinion, the state of Massachusetts can take part in this driving revolution: if it banks on its major expertise areas like computer software development.

At present, five states including Washington, D.C. are allowing the testing of self-driving cars on public roads and highways.

Attorneys at Crowe & Mulvey, LLP say that the prevalence of autonomous vehiles in streets can greatly impact the rate of personal injury accidents, particularly car crashes.


read more

There is a period when getting pregnant was like a death sentence. There is a 50-50 possibility that the mother, the youngster, or both may die during childbirth. This was because in the past, a woman gave birth at home and if she was fortunate, would have a midwife in attendance who would know more than the mother about it, but not much.What exactly the injury of childbirth did not do, contamination and infection would complete since sanitation wasn’t a top concern.

Of course, these things are no longer correct, and while moms and kids still die in the complications of childbirth, the quantities are the approach. On hand, a reliable obstetrician will be generally speaking to assist with a birth, before performing the action and everybody wipes their hands. Nevertheless, you may still find occasions when birth injuries occur that may bring about death or ongoing health problems for that kid.

A team of attorneys located in Philadelphia, a surprisingly high number (2 from 1,000 live births) of youngsters present with all the characteristics of cerebral palsy (CP) after-birth. Evidence implies that a substantial amount could be due to medical malpractice whilst the correct reason behind neonatal CP is not acknowledged.

CP can be a motor development problem where the affected could have moderate to significant trouble in preventing their actions, with respect to the form of present. These affected by the more serious kinds of CP would be incapable of taking care of themselves and would require special attention throughout their lives.

At birth, CP may be due to several facets, for example cause exposure of mom or an intrauterine infection’s profile during pregnancy. However, it is also feasible that the CP resulted towards the child’s head before from an inadequate flow of air, during, and after the challenges of childbirth. Medical neglect kicks in if the physician does not follow the method that is standard to clear the newborn’s airways immediately upon distribution, leading to CP development.


read more

Cruise ships are definitely an enjoyable way to travel. Passengers are promised the luxury of five-star hotels while they move from one exotic destination to the next. There are also excursions and in-land activities to look forward to, promising passengers the opportunity to explore the locales in the itinerary and experience plenty of adventures. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that passengers won’t face certain risks and dangers while taking part in these excursions. Excursion accidents are a serious cause for concern.

Dock accidents are among the most common hazards associated with cruise ship incidents. These accidents happen when ships fail to dock at the port properly, causing instability issues as passengers disembark from the vessel. The unstable lurching can cause passengers to slip and fall, leading to injuries that can have grave and even lifelong consequences. While minor falls can result in broken bones and lacerations, a passenger who falls flat on his back or hits his head can suffer from more serious injuries such as spinal cord damage and head trauma. Other injuries that can result from dock accidents include several knee injuries such as dislocation.

Incidents such as these should not eclipse the enjoyable vacation promised by cruise lines to their passengers. Cruise lines have full responsibility to ensure that these accidents are prevented by taking necessary steps and precaution of safe docking. Failure to meet these expectations can have grave effects for the passengers that have put their trust on these cruise lines. As a result of dock accidents and injuries, passengers have the right to pursue legal action and receive compensation to cover medical expenses and other fees. Visit a cruise ship lawyer website to learn more about what people can do after being involved in cruise accidents.


read more